4.5 Article

The gradual minimum covering location problem

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY
卷 74, 期 4, 页码 1092-1104

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2022.2056533

关键词

Minimum covering; gradual coverage; cooperative coverage; undesirable facility; location problem

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The gradual minimum covering location problem with distance constraints (GMCLPDC) deals with locating undesirable facilities on a geographical map, considering a minimum distance between them. We propose a mixed-integer program and a threshold accepting heuristic to solve the problem. Computational experiments show the effectiveness of the heuristic in delivering quality solutions, outperforming the solver Gurobi.
The minimum covering location problem with distance constraints deals with locating a set of undesirable facilities on a geographical map, where there is a given minimum distance between any pair of located facilities. A covering radius is defined within which the population node is fully covered and beyond that it is not covered at all. This setting may not be applicable in practice because usually the coverage gradually decreases with an increase in the distance. Additionally, undesirable facilities may have a cooperative adverse impact on the nearby population. We introduce the gradual coverage to the problem that extends the classic definition of the coverage and is more suitable for modelling real-world applications. We name the problem the gradual minimum covering location problem with distance constraints (GMCLPDC). We propose a mixed-integer program for GMCLPDC where cooperation of facilities is also considered. We propose a threshold accepting heuristic as the solution method. We conduct computational experiments on instances with up to 10,000 nodes. The outcomes indicate that the heuristic delivers quality solutions and outperforms the solver Gurobi. We also show an application of our model in Sydney metropolitan area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据