4.5 Article

An alternative Bayesian data envelopment analysis approach for correcting bias or efficiency estimators

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY
卷 74, 期 4, 页码 1021-1041

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2022.2053309

关键词

Data envelopment analysis; Bayesian methods; efficiency; statistical inference; banking

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, an alternative Bayesian DEA approach for obtaining consistent efficiency estimators for convex sets is introduced. The consistency of the estimates is proven through statistical analysis, empirical analysis, and computational analysis. The findings justify the appropriateness of the distributional assumptions and the validity of the bias-correction procedure. The alternative Bayesian DEA estimates show strong correlation with DEA-smoothed bootstrap estimates and have lower mean square error and mean absolute error.
In this study, we introduce an alternative Bayesian data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach yielding consistent efficiency estimators for convex sets. This approach draws on two distributional assumptions, a uniform likelihood and a beta prior. It is known from the literature that the combination of those two distributions leads to a reasonable estimator of the parameter. The prior of our approach is non-informative in a relative sense and does not depend on sample size. The consistency of the estimates is proven by formal statistical analysis, empirical analysis using real-world data, and computational analysis using simulated data. Our findings justify the appropriateness of our distributional assumptions and the validity of the presented bias-correction procedure. Our estimates are strongly correlated with the DEA-smoothed bootstrap estimates while presenting lower mean square error (MSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). Specifically, the correlation coefficients range between 0.898 and 0.952. The MSE of the alternative Bayesian DEA estimates gradually decreases while sample size increases. For samples of 500, 1,000 and 1,500 units, the MSE is as low as 6.4x10(-4), 1.4x10(-4) and 6x10 (-5), respectively. Also, an inverse relationship between the sample size and the length of the confidence intervals of the alternative Bayesian DEA estimates is present.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据