4.7 Article

Improved high order differential feedback control of quadrotor UAV based on improved extended state observer

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2022.03.019

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61873186]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents an improved extended state observer (IESO) for estimating the unknown model and disturbance of a quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle (QUAY), and designs an improved high-order differential feedback controller (IHODFC) to counteract the undesired force. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of this control scheme.
Quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle (QUAY) system is nonlinear, strongly coupled, and sensitive to unknown disturbances and uncertainties. The uncertainty, disturbance, and even unknown model function are the undesired force acting on the QUAY, so they must be totally estimated online. The ideal control scheme is that the total estimation is feedback in the opposite direction to the controller to compensate the model error or counteract the force caused by the unknown model and disturbance. An improved extended state observer (IESO), also called an improved high-order differentiator (IHOD), is designed to estimate the unknown model and disturbance of the QUAY. It is proved that the IESO is one type higher than the traditional ESO. Consequently, the estimation accuracy of IESO is higher than that of the ESO at the same bandwidth, and is verified through some typical functions. The IESO estimations for 2nd-order derivative of reference input and the total unknown model function are fed back to compensate the undesired force in opposite direction, and then an improved high-order differential feedback controller (IHODFC) is designed with the assigned closed-loop poles. The proof of the stability of the closed-loop system controlled by the IHODFC is given. The performance is verified by the tests using the Pixhawk-based DJI F450 frame experimental verification platform. The IHODFC superiority is demonstrated by comparing the classic model-free controller PID and active disturbance rejection control (ADRC). (C) 2022 The Franklin Institute. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据