4.7 Article

Unique surface structure resulting in the excellent long-term thermal stability of Fe4Sb12-based filled skutterudites

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 42, 期 3, 页码 1007-1013

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.10.055

关键词

Skutterudite; Thermal stability; Microstructure; Thermoelectric performance

资金

  1. Science and Technology Planning Program of Jiangxi Provincial Education Department [GJJ180916]
  2. National Undergraduate Training Program for Innovation [202011843018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that BaFe4Sb12 materials exhibit excellent long-term thermal stability due to the unique decomposition layer formed during annealing. The decomposition rate decreases with increasing annealing time, resulting in a protective cover that effectively prevents Sb sublimation. The thermoelectric properties, including the figure of merit, remain stable during the annealing process.
The evolutions of the phase composition, microstructure, and thermoelectric properties of BaFe4Sb12 materials at 773 K in vacuum were investigated to evaluate their long-term thermal stabilities. It was observed that the interior of the BaFe4Sb12 exhibited excellent thermal stability, while the surface decomposed into FeSb2, Sb, and Ba5Sb3. However, the decomposition rate sharply declined with increasing annealing time, and the thicknesses of the decomposition layer was approximately 49 mu m after annealing for 30 days. Thermoelectric performances negligibly changed during the annealing process, and the dimensionless figure of merit remained in the range of 0.61 +/- 0.02 at 800 K. The unique decomposition layer, wherein Ba5Sb3 compounds enriched in the outermost layer and along the FeSb2 grain boundaries, served as a dense protective cover to effectively retard the Sb sublimation, resulting in excellent long-term thermal stability. This work provides a plausible explanation for the long-term thermal stability of Fe4Sb12-based filled skutterudites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据