4.7 Article

Microwave hybrid sintering of 0.95(Mg0.95Zn0.05)TiO3-0.05CaTiO3 ceramics and its microwave dielectric properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 42, 期 12, 页码 4974-4979

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.04.035

关键词

Microwave hybrid sintering; Microwave dielectric; Microwave assisted sintering; MgTiO3; Electroceramic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microwave dielectric ceramic powder of 0.95(Mg0.95Zn0.05)TiO3-0.05CaTiO(3) (MCT) was prepared using solid-state reaction method and different sintering techniques were employed. The hybrid microwave sintering technique showed better dielectric properties compared to other techniques.
Microwave dielectric ceramic powder of 0.95(Mg0.95Zn0.05)TiO3-0.05CaTiO(3) (MCT) has been prepared by solid-state reaction method through single-step calcination at 1150 degrees C. The green bodies prepared from the calcined powder have been sintered by conventional, susceptor-aided, and hybrid microwave sintering techniques followed by annealing. XRD of calcined and sintered ceramics show (Mg,Zn)TiO3 as a major phase with CaTiO3 as a minor secondary phase. Fractographs of fired ceramics obtained by SEM show similar features in conventional and hybrid microwave types of sintering. Microwave dielectric properties such as relative permittivity(epsilon(r)), temperature coefficient of resonant frequency(tau(f)), and unloaded quality factors (Q(u)) for conventional sintered at 1325 degrees C for 4 h are-epsilon(r)similar to 19.8, tau(f)< -6 ppm/degrees C and Q(u).f 69,600 GHz at 6 GHz. Ceramics obtained through susceptor-aided microwave sintering at 1325 degrees C for 4 h show poor fired density. But ceramics got by microwave-hybrid sintering (resistive + microwave) at the same temperature show epsilon(r)similar to 20.6, Q(u).f similar to 81,600 GHz at 6 GHz and tau(f)similar to-6.9 ppm/degrees C. The effect of hybrid microwave sintering on the dielectric properties of MCT ceramics is found to be more subtle than microstructural.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据