4.7 Article

Evolution of core-rim structures and phase transformations in infra-red transmitting Y-α-SiAlON ceramics

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 42, 期 4, 页码 1354-1361

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.11.057

关键词

alpha-SiAlON ceramics; Core-rim structures; Phase transformation; Liquid phase sintering; Infrared transmittance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51532006, 52032002]
  2. Shanghai Technical Service Center for Advanced Ceramics Structure Design and Precision Manufacturing [20DZ2294000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Core-rim structures were observed in Y-alpha-SiAlON ceramics hot-pressed between 1550-1950 degrees C. Doping mainly occurred in the alpha'-rims, with a transition layer grown first on the alpha-cores. The presence of elongated p'-grain was observed as a minor phase with ce- or AlN-cores. The alpha' -> beta' transformation was found to be controlled by the transient liquid-phase.
Core-rim structures were observed as common features in Y-alpha-SiAlON ceramics hot-pressed between 1550-1950 degrees C. We found most dopants were taken into alpha'-rims, and a transition layer grown first on alpha-cores from liquid-phase over-saturated with metal solutes. Elongated p'-grain were formed as minor phase with ce- or AlN-cores thus only after the alpha' matrix had consumed up all Y solutes, revealing that the alpha' -> beta' transformation is controlled by the transient liquid-phase and similar defects and dangling bonds could be detected in both SiA1ON phases by cathodoluminescence. Quantitative assessment of Y-m/3Si12-(m+n)Alm+nOnN16-n demonstrates the multiphase evolution, initiated by over-saturation of Y solutes at low temperatures thus retaining alpha-phase as cores to lower the infra-red transmittance, dictated by homogenization of Al solutes at higher temperature. The elimination of those phase boundaries leads to better dopant and sintering design for achieving transparent and high-performance SiAlON ceramics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据