4.7 Article

Spark plasma sintering, mechanical and in-vitro behavior of a novel Sr- and Mg-containing bioactive glass for biomedical applications

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 42, 期 4, 页码 1776-1783

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.11.061

关键词

Bioactive glasses; Spark plasma sintering; Rietveld method; Mechanical properties; In-vitro tests

资金

  1. UNISS
  2. MIUR special scholarship, within the joint agreement UNICA-UNISS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The bioactive glass BGMS10 containing 10 mol.% SrO and 10 mol.% MgO has low crystallization tendency. With the help of SPS, highly dense and fully amorphous products can be obtained at 750 degrees C. The glass begins to crystallize at 850 degrees C, and 95 wt. % crystallized ceramics are produced at 950 degrees C. The main crystalline phases are alpha- and beta-CaSiO3. Crystallization is accompanied by an increase in Young's modulus. Partially crystallized samples have higher Vickers hardness but lower density compared to fully crystallized ones.
The so-called BGMS10, a bioactive glass containing 10 mol.% SrO and 10 mol.% MgO, displays a low inclination to crystallize, as confirmed by its high activation energy (538.9 kJ/mol). Such peculiar aspect and the beneficial use of SPS allow for the obtainment of 99.7 % dense and fully amorphous products at 750 degrees C. The incipient crystallization in the glass is observed when temperature is increased to 850 degrees C, while 95 wt. % crystallized ceramics are produced at 950 degrees C. Main crystalline phases are alpha- and beta-CaSiO3, with grain size of 89 and 97 nm, respectively. Glass crystallization is accompanied by Young's modulus increase from 90.92 to 98.38 GPa. On the other hand, partially crystallized samples (850 degrees C) exhibit higher Vickers hardness (718.8) compared to fully crystallized ones (619.8), which show lower density (98.6 %). In-vitro tests in SBF indicate that the silica-gel film preceding apatite nucleation is mostly formed on the amorphous substrate region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据