4.6 Article

Critical Role of Structural Water for Enhanced Li+ Insertion Kinetics in Crystalline Tungsten Oxides

期刊

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/ac58c8

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1653827, ECCS-1542015]
  2. State of North Carolina
  3. Office of Naval Research
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Materials Research [1653827] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the role of structural water in transition metal oxides during Li+ insertion. The presence of structural water improves the kinetics of Li+ insertion and reduces the potential-dependent insertion process.
Electrochemical ion insertion into transition metal oxides forms the foundation of several energy technologies. Transition metal oxides can exhibit sluggish ion transport and/or phase-transformation kinetics during ion insertion that can limit their performance at high rates (<10 min). In this study, we investigate the role of structural water in transition metal oxides during Li+ insertion using staircase potentiostatic electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (SPEIS) and electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance (EQCM) analysis of WO3 center dot H2O and WO3 thin-film electrodes. Overall, the presence of structural water in WO3 center dot H2O improves Li+ insertion kinetics compared to WO3 and leads to a less potential-dependent insertion process. Operando electrogravimetry and 3D Bode impedance analyses of nanostructured films reveal that the presence of structural water promotes charge accommodation without significant co-insertion of solvent, leading to our hypothesis that the electrochemically induced structural transitions of WO3 hinder the electrode response at faster timescales (<10 min). Designing layered materials with confined fluids that exhibit less structural transitions may lead to more versatile ion-insertion hosts for next-generation electrochemical technologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据