4.4 Article

Effect of optimum process parameters on material removal in rotational-magnetorheological miniature gear profile polishing (R-MRMGPP) process

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40430-022-03515-w

关键词

Finite element analysis; Rotational-magnetorheological finishing; Miniature gear; Response surface method; SS316L

资金

  1. Science & Engineering Research Board (SERB), New Delhi, India [EEQ/2017/000597]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces a new flow restrictor for precise polishing of miniature gear profiles in the rotational-magnetorheological process, investigates the effects of key factors on polishing performance using response surface method and simulation in COMSOL® software, aiding in accurately understanding the processing mechanism.
The traditional finishing method causes form inaccuracy in miniature gear profiles due to the transverse grinding line, fine microcrack, claw-mark, burr, pit and thermal distortions. Because of the small space between their teeth, tiny gear can only be polished in a very few ways. This article reports on the new flow restrictor used in rotational-magnetorheological miniature gear profile polishing (R-MRMGPP) process for precise polishing of miniature gear profiles. The response surface method (RSM) is utilized to investigate the effect of key factors on process performance. Further, simulation of finishing forces is conducted using COMSOL (R) Multiphysics software, which is based on finite element analysis (FEA). The study of finishing forces assists in accurately understanding the processing mechanism. A model is also simulated to determine the depth of indentation produced by an abrasive on SS316L miniature gear tooth profile due to normal finishing forces. Experimental results identified that combining a higher number of finishing cycles, a lower volumetric proportion of iron/abrasive particles, and a higher extrusion pressure is more favourable to obtain high material removal rate (MRR).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据