4.6 Article

False Discovery Rate Control via Data Splitting

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2022.2060113

关键词

Data perturbation; FDR control; Feature selection; Graphical model; Linear model

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DMS-1903139, DMS-2015411, DMS-2124535]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a new data-splitting method DS for controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) while maintaining high power. Additionally, a Multiple Data Splitting (MDS) method is proposed to stabilize selection results and boost power.
Selecting relevant features associated with a given response variable is an important problem in many scientific fields. Quantifying quality and uncertainty of a selection result via false discovery rate (FDR) control has been of recent interest. This article introduces a data-splitting method (referred to as DS) to asymptotically control the FDR while maintaining a high power. For each feature, DS constructs a test statistic by estimating two independent regression coefficients via data splitting. FDR control is achieved by taking advantage of the statistic's property that, for any null feature, its sampling distribution is symmetric about zero; whereas for a relevant feature, its sampling distribution has a positive mean. Furthermore, a Multiple Data Splitting (MDS) method is proposed to stabilize the selection result and boost the power. Surprisingly, with the FDR under control, MDS not only helps overcome the power loss caused by data splitting, but also results in a lower variance of the false discovery proportion (FDP) compared with all other methods in consideration. Extensive simulation studies and a real-data application show that the proposed methods are robust to the unknown distribution of features, easy to implement and computationally efficient, and are often the most powerful ones among competitors especially when the signals are weak and correlations or partial correlations among features are high. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据