4.5 Article

Discriminator for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Using MALDI-MSI in a Murine Model

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jasms.2c00015

关键词

machine learning; MALDI-MSI; murine model; cutaneous leishmaniasis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a low-cost method to generate detection and classification models for cutaneous leishmaniasis using MALDI-MSI images. The models achieve a 95% efficiency in separating healthy samples from infected samples and 67% effectiveness in differentiating successfully treated samples from unsuccessfully treated samples.
Cutaneous leishmaniasis is a skin disease caused by flagellate protozoa of the genus Leishmania and transmitted by sandflies of the genus Lutzomyia. Around 1 million new cases occur in the world annually, with a total of 12 million people affected, mainly in rural areas with low access to health services and adequate treatments. In the area of the Americas, Colombia has one of the highest infection rates after Brazil. Topical treatments with pentamidine isethionate (PMD) present an attractive alternative due to their ease of application and low costs. However, cutaneous leishmaniasis lesions present nodules with seropurulent exudate that, when drying, form hyperkeratotic lesions, hindering the effective penetration of drugs for their treatment. The use of molecular histology techniques, such as MALDI-MSI, allow in situ evaluation of the penetration of the treatment to the sections of the dermis where the disease-causing parasite resides. However, the large volume of information generated makes it impossible to process it manually. Machine learning techniques allow the unsupervised processing of large amounts of information, generating prediction models for the classification of new information. This work proposes a low-cost method to generate cutaneous leishmaniasis detection and classification models using MALDI-MSI images taken from murine models. The proposed models allow a 95% efficiency when separating healthy samples from infected samples and an effectiveness of 67% when separating effectively treated samples from unsuccessfully treated samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据