4.6 Article

Is it time to stop driving?: A randomized clinical trial of an online decision aid for older drivers

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 70, 期 7, 页码 1987-1996

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17791

关键词

decision aid; decision-making; driving; geriatric; motor vehicle; randomized trial

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 AG059613, CTSA UL1 TR002535]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to test whether an online driving decision aid could improve decision quality for older adults considering when to stop driving. The results show that the online tool decreased decision conflict and increased knowledge in this sample of older adults. While most participants chose to continue driving, the use of such resources in clinical or community settings may support older adults as they transition to other forms of transportation.
Background Many older adults face the difficult decision of when to stop driving. We sought to test whether an online driving decision aid (DDA) would improve decision quality. Methods This prospective two-arm randomized trial enrolled English-speaking licensed drivers (age >= 70 years) without significant cognitive impairment but with >= 1 diagnosis associated with increased likelihood of driving cessation; all participants received primary care in clinics associated with study sites in three states. The intervention was the online Healthwise (R) DDA for older adults addressing Is it time to stop driving?; control was web-based information for older drivers only. The primary outcome was decision conflict as estimated by the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS; lower scores indicate higher quality). Secondary outcomes were knowledge and decision self-efficacy about driving decisions. We examined postrandomization differences in primary and secondary outcomes by study arm using generalized linear mixed-effects models with adjustment for site and prerandomization scores. Results Among 301 participants (mean age: 77.1 years), 51.2% identified as female and the majority as non-Hispanic (99.0%) and white (95.3%); 98.0% lived in an urban area. Participant characteristics were similar by study arm but differed across sites. Intervention participants had a lower mean DCS score (12.3 DDA vs 15.2 control; adjusted mean ratio [AMR] 0.76, 95%CI 0.61-0.95; p = 0.017). Intervention participants had higher mean knowledge scores (88.9 DDA vs. 79.9 control; OR 1.13, 95%CI 1.01-1.27, p = 0.038); there was no difference between groups in self-efficacy scores. The DDA had high acceptability; 86.9% of those who viewed it said they would recommend it to others in similar situations. Conclusions The online Healthwise (R) DDA decreased decision conflict and increased knowledge in this sample of English-speaking, older adults without significant cognitive impairment, although most chose to continue driving. Use of such resources in clinical or community settings may support older adults as they transition from driving to other forms of mobility. Trial registration identifier Advancing Understanding of Transportation Options (AUTO) NCT04141891.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据