4.7 Article

New inductively coupled plasma for atomic spectrometry: the microwave-sustained, inductively coupled, atmospheric-pressure plasma (MICAP)

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
卷 31, 期 2, 页码 440-449

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ja00418g

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [IIP-1448717, DOE DE-FG02-98 ER 14890]
  3. Kraft and President's Diversity Fellowships of Indiana University
  4. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1448717] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel inductively coupled plasma (ICP), termed the microwave-sustained, inductively coupled, atmospheric-pressure plasma (MICAP), has been developed that operates at microwave frequency (2.45 GHz). To sustain the new plasma, a dielectric resonator ring (fabricated from an advanced technical ceramic) is coupled with a 2.45 GHz microwave field generated from a microwave-oven magnetron. The microwave field induces polarization currents (small shifts in the equilibrium positions of bound electrons) in the resonator that generate an orthogonal magnetic field, analogous to that produced by electrical current within a traditional ICP load coil. This magnetic field is capable of sustaining an annular plasma in either air or nitrogen that can readily accept solution samples in the form of a wet aerosol produced from a conventional nebulizer and a spray chamber. An initial analytical evaluation of the MICAP with radially viewed optical emission spectrometry (OES) revealed that limits of detection ranged from 0.03-70 ppb with relative standard deviations from 0.7-2.0%. In addition, the new plasma exhibited good tolerance to solvent loading, and was found to be capable of accepting a wide variety of organic solvents directly and salt solutions up to 3% w/w concentration. Combined, the results suggest that the MICAP could be a competitive, simpler alternative to traditional, radiofrequency argon ICP-OES.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据