4.8 Article

Catalytic Asymmetric Diarylation of Internal Acyclic Styrenes and Enamides

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 144, 期 18, 页码 8389-8398

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c03411

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSFC/China [22171079]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [21ZR1480400]
  3. Shanghai Rising-Star Program [20QA1402300]
  4. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project [2018SHZDZX03]
  5. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [B16017]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports a new catalyst system for the enantioselective transformation of internal acyclic alkenes. By applying different reaction types to two common acyclic alkenes, products with asymmetric centers were obtained. Moreover, the formation of incontiguous stereocenters was achieved through an interrupted chain-walking process.
Enantioselective transformations of olefins are among the most important strategies for the asymmetric synthesis of organic compounds. Chemo-, diastereo-, and stereoselective control of reactions with internal acyclic alkenes for the construction of functionalized acyclic alkanes still remain a persistent challenge. Here, we report a palladium- catalyzed asymmetric regiodivergent Heck-type diarylation of internal acyclic alkenes. The 1,2-diarylation of two accessible acyclic alkenes, cinnamyl carbamates and enamides with diazonium salts and aromatic boronic acids, furnishes products containing vicinal stereogenic centers via the stereospecific formation of carbonyl coordination-assisted transient palladacycles. Moreover, the asymmetric migratory diarylation of enamides enables the formation of incontiguous stereocenters by an interrupted diastereoselective 1,3-chain-walking process. This protocol streamlines access to highly functionalized multisubstituted enantioenriched carbamates and amine derivatives which are embedded in the key biologically active motifs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据