4.8 Article

Methane Monooxygenase Mimic Asymmetric Oxidation: Self-Assemblingμ-Hydroxo, Carboxylate-Bridged Diiron(III)-CatalyzedEnantioselective Dehydrogenation

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 144, 期 13, 页码 5976-5984

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c00638

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [92156008, 22161142016, 21971148]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mimicking naturally occurring metalloenzymes for catalytic asymmetric oxidation reactions has been a long-standing goal in modern chemistry. In this study, a series of chiral diiron complexes mimicking methane monooxygenase (MMO) were designed and synthesized, exhibiting efficient catalytic reactivity in dehydrogenative kinetic resolution. The C9 complex was identified as the optimal catalyst with high chiral recognition.
Mimicking naturally occurring metalloenzymes to enrichthe diversity of catalytic asymmetric oxidation reactions is a long-standing goal for modern chemistry. Toward this end, a range ofmethane monooxygenase (MMO) mimic chiral carboxylate-bridged (mu-hydroxo) diiron(III) dimer complexes using salan as basal ligand andsodium aryl carboxylate as additive have been designed and synthesized.The chiral diiron complexes exhibit efficient catalytic reactivity indehydrogenative kinetic resolution of indolines using environmentallybenign hydrogen peroxide as oxidant. In particular, complexC9bearingsterically encumbered salan ligands and a 2-naphthoate bridge isidentified as the optimal catalyst in terms of chiral recognition. Furtherinvestigation reveals that this MMO mimic chiral catalyst can be readilygenerated by self-assembly under the dehydrogenation conditions. Theself-assembling catalytic system is applicable to a series of indolines with multiple stereocenters and diverse substituent patterns inhigh efficiency with a high level of chiral recognition (selectivity factor up to 153). Late-stage dehydrogenative kinetic resolution ofbioactive molecules is further examined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据