4.8 Article

Nontraditional Fragment Couplings of Alcohols and Carboxylic Acids: C(sp3)-C(sp3) Cross-Coupling via Radical Sorting

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 144, 期 14, 页码 6185-6192

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c02062

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), the NIH [R35GM134897-03]
  2. Princeton Catalysis Initiative
  3. Princeton University
  4. Taylor family

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alcohols and carboxylic acids are important functional groups in organic chemistry that can undergo radical activation and transition metal catalysis under visible light photoredox catalysis. In this report, a dual combination of NHC-mediated deoxygenation and hypervalent iodine-mediated decarboxylation is used to achieve the C(sp3)-C(sp3) cross-coupling of alcohols and carboxylic acids. This method offers a mild and practical approach for the synthesis of alkyl-alkyl cross-coupled products.
Alcohols and carboxylic acids are among the most commercially abundant, synthetically versatile, and operationallyconvenient functional groups in organic chemistry. Under visible light photoredox catalysis, these native synthetic handles readilyundergo radical activation, and the resulting open-shell intermediates can subsequently participate in transition metal catalysis. Inthis report, we describe the C(sp3)-C(sp3) cross-coupling of alcohols and carboxylic acids through the dual combination ofN-heterocyclic carbene (NHC)-mediated deoxygenation and hypervalent iodine-mediated decarboxylation. This mild and practical Ni-catalyzed radical-coupling protocol was employed to prepare a wide array of alkyl-alkyl cross-coupled products, including highlycongested quaternary carbon centers from the corresponding tertiary alcohols or tertiary carboxylic acids. We demonstrate thesynthetic applications of this methodology to alcoholC1-alkylation and formal homologation, as well as to the late-stagefunctionalization of drugs, natural products, and biomolecules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据