4.8 Article

Electrocleavage Synthesis of Solution-Processed, Imine-Linked, and Crystalline Covalent Organic Framework Thin Films

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 144, 期 20, 页码 8961-8968

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c13072

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21975078]
  2. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2021A1515010311]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2019B030301003]
  4. 111 Project [BP0618009]
  5. Thousand Youth Talents Plan
  6. China Scholarship Council [202006155049]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An unprecedented electrocleavage synthesis strategy is reported for the direct synthesis of COF films at room temperature. This strategy involves the cathodic exfoliation of COF powders to nanosheets, followed by nanosheets migrating to the anode and reproducing the COF structures by anodic oxidation. The COF films possess high crystallinity and hierarchical porosity, and have demonstrated rapid iodine adsorption with record-high rate constants, making them an excellent platform for promoting mass transfer.
Developing a general, facile, and direct strategy for synthesizing thin films of covalent organic frameworks (COFs) is amajor challenge in thisfield. Herein, we report an unprecedented electrocleavage synthesis strategy to produce imine-linked COFfilms directly on electrodes from electrolyte solutions at room temperature. This strategy enables the cathodic exfoliation of the COFpowders to nanosheets by electrochemical reduction and protonation, followed by nanosheets migrating to the anode andreproducing the COF structures by anodic oxidation. Our method is adaptable with most imine-linked COFs by virtue of the lowredox potential of the imine bonds, whereas the COFfilms possess high crystallinity and hierarchical porosity. We highlight theseCOFfilms as a superb platform for promoting mass transfer by demonstrating their extraordinarily rapid iodine adsorption with record-high rate constants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据