4.8 Article

In-Cell Quantification of Drugs by Magic-Angle Spinning Dynamic Nuclear Polarization NMR

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 144, 期 15, 页码 6734-6741

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c12442

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research Chemical Biology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Determination of intracellular drug concentrations is crucial for understanding drug function and efficacy, but currently there is no experimental technique that satisfies the requirements of nondestructive measurement, no modification of drugs or targets, and detection of low concentrations. In this study, the use of magic-angle spinning dynamic nuclear polarization technique is proposed to fulfill these requirements, and successful estimation of intracellular drug amounts is demonstrated for the first time.
The determination of intracellular drug concentrations can provide a better understanding of the drug function and efficacy. Ideally, this should be performed nondestructively, with no modification of either the drug or the target, and with the capability to detect low amounts of the molecule of interest, in many cases in the mu M to nM range (pmol to fmol per million cells). Unfortunately, it is currently challenging to have an experimental technique that provides direct quantitative measurements of intracellular drug concentrations that simultaneously satisfies these requirements. Here, we show that magic-angle spinning dynamic nuclear polarization (MAS DNP) can be used to fulfill these requirements. We apply a quantitative N-15 MAS DNP approach in combination with N-15 labeling to quantify the intracellular amount of the drug [N-15]CHIR-98014, an activator of the Wingless and hit-1 signaling pathway, determining intracellular drug amounts in the range of tens to hundreds of picomoles per million cells. This is, to our knowledge, the first time that MAS DNP has been used to successfully estimate intracellular drug amounts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据