4.8 Article

Mechanochemical Molecular Migration on Graphene

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 144, 期 16, 页码 7181-7188

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c13193

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF Center for the Mechanical Control of Chemistry [CHE-2023644]
  2. Vagelos Institute for Energy Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we investigate the use of graphene curvature for directional molecular motion and provide atomistic insights into curvature-dependent molecular migration. We demonstrate that the migration of molecules on wrinkled/rippled graphene sheets preferentially occurs from positive to negative curvature regions. Based on these findings, we suggest exploring other two-dimensional materials for controlled molecular motion.
In this study, we propose that the curvature of graphene can be exploited to perform directional molecular motion and provide atomistic insights into the curvature-dependent molecular migration through density functional theory calculations. We first reveal the origin of the different migration trends observed experimentally for aromatic molecules with electron-donating and -withdrawing groups on p-doped functionalized graphene. Next, we show that the kinetic barrier for migration depends on the amount and nature of the curvature, that is, positive versus negative curvature. We find that the molecular migration on a wrinkled/rippled graphene sheet preferentially happens from the valley (positive curvature) to the mountain (negative curvature) regions. To understand the origin of such curvature-dependent molecular motion and migrational kinetic barrier trends, we develop a descriptor based on the frontier orbital orientation of graphene. Finally, based on these findings, we predict that time- and space-varying curvature can drive directional molecular motion on graphene and thus further propose that efforts should focus on exploring other two-dimensional materials as active platforms for performing controlled molecular motion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据