4.5 Article

Scattering by a rigid sphere of audio sound generated by a parametric array loudspeaker

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
卷 151, 期 3, 页码 1615-1626

出版社

ACOUSTICAL SOC AMER AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1121/10.0009750

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [LP160100616]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11874219]
  3. Australian Research Council [LP160100616] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work investigates the scattering of audio sound generated by a parametric array loudspeaker on a rigid sphere. A computationally efficient method is developed to calculate the sound fields using spherical harmonic expansion. The study reveals the effects of the rigid sphere on the audio sound field and the scattering characteristics of ultrasound.
This work investigates the scattering by a rigid sphere of audio sound generated by a parametric array loudspeaker (pal). A computationally efficient method utilizing a spherical harmonic expansion is developed to calculate the quasilinear solution of audio sound fields based on both Kuznetsov and Westervelt equations. The accuracy of using the Westervelt equation is examined, and the rigid sphere scattering effects are simulated with the proposed method. It is found the results obtained using the Westervelt equation are inaccurate near the sphere at low frequencies. Contrary to conventional loudspeakers, the directivity of the audio sound generated by a pal severely deteriorates behind a sphere, as the ultrasounds maintaining the directivity of the audio sound are almost completely blocked by the sphere. Instead, the ultrasounds are reflected and generate audio sound on the front side of the sphere. It means that a listener in front of the pal will hear the audio sound scattered back after introducing the sphere as if it is reflected by the sphere. The experiment results are also presented to validate the numerical results. (c) 2022 Acoustical Society of America.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据