4.7 Article

Characteristics of lump lignite pyrolysis and the influence of temperature on lignite swelling in underground coal gasification

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL AND APPLIED PYROLYSIS
卷 117, 期 -, 页码 228-235

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2015.11.011

关键词

Underground coal gasification; Fissure; Swell; Lump coal; Pyrolysis; Lignite

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program 863 of China [2011AA050106, 2011AA050103]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Underground coal gasification (UCG) allows in situ conversion of unmineable coal deposits into a combustible gas. UCG involves a number of steps, including combustion, oxidation-reduction (REDOX) reactions, pyrolysis, and drying, within the gasification channel at high temperatures. Pyrolysis, in particular, plays a vital role in UCG. We herein investigated the pyrolysis behavior of lump lignite from Inner Mongolia, China, and investigated the influence of pyrolysis on the swelling behavior of the lump lignite. The samples (50 x 40 x 40 mm(3)) were studied at a heating rate of 3 degrees C/min. The resulting chars were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. In addition, the composition of the pyrolysis gas released from lump lignite was compared with that released from particle lignite (particle diameter =1 mm). The results showed that obvious swelling between 100 and 600 degrees C, followed by subtle swelling events between 600 and 900 degrees C. The concentrations of H-2 and CO gases in lump lignite were higher than those in particle lignite when exposed to elevated temperatures, and the main functional groups disappeared at high temperatures due to thermal cracking. Consequently, pyrolysis occurring in the gasification channel converted the coal around the channel into a highly porous char whose permeability aided the transport of gasification agents and product gases in coal seam. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据