4.5 Article

Surgical timing after preoperative chemotherapy is associated with oncologic outcomes in resectable colorectal liver metastases

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 125, 期 8, 页码 1260-1268

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.26832

关键词

colorectal liver metastases; oncologic outcomes; perioperative complications; portal venous embolization; time to resection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the time to resection following preoperative chemotherapy impacts oncologic outcomes in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis. It is recommended to consider hepatic resection within two months after the end of chemotherapy whenever feasible.
Introduction Preoperative chemotherapy (POC) is often employed for patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). The time to resection (TTR) following the end of chemotherapy may impact oncologic outcomes; this phenomenon has not been studied in CRLM. Methods We queried our institutional cancer database for patients with resected CRLM after POC from 2003 to 2019. TTR was calculated from date of last cytotoxic chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to analyze recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Results We identified n = 187 patients. One hundred twenty-four (66%) patients had a TTR of <2 months, while 63 (33%) had a TTR of >= 2 months. Median follow-up was 36 months. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with TTR >= 2 months had shorter RFS (median 11 vs. 17 months, p = 0.002) and OS (median 44 vs. 62 months, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, TTR >= 2 months was independently associated with worse RFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06-2.22, p = 0.02) and OS (HR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.11-2.77, p = 0.01). Conclusion TTR >= 2 months following POC is independently associated with worse oncologic outcomes in patients with resectable CRLM. We therefore recommend consideration for hepatic resection of CRLM within this window whenever feasible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据