4.3 Article

HTS Joint Resistance for High-Field Magnets: Experiment and Temperature-Dependent Modeling

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10948-022-06181-0

关键词

HTS tape; HTS joint resistance; V-I characteristics; Temperature-dependent model; Over-current; High-field magnet

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51807128]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Benefiting from high critical temperature and current, second-generation high-temperature superconducting tapes are widely used in large-scale magnet applications. This study proposes a temperature-dependent model for the joint resistance of these tapes, which matches well with experimental and analytical results. The model can provide accurate references for designing superconducting joints and early warnings for over-current conditions.
Benefiting from the high critical temperature and high critical current, the second-generation high-temperature superconducting (HTS) tape is widely used in various large-scale magnet applications. Due to the length limitation of producing superconducting tapes, the joints between superconducting tapes are inevitable for large-scale high-field magnets. The joule loss from the joint resistance under over-current conditions is even larger, which will cause a sharp temperature rise, and will also decay the critical current of the superconducting tape. In this paper, 3 configurations of HTS joints are adopted to model the joint resistance characteristics using new methods, whose joint resistance model is coupled with the real-time operating temperature. The results show that the proposed temperature-dependent HTS joint resistance model well matches the experiment and analytical solution. Therefore, both the experiment and novel modeling investigation can provide useful and accurate references for the superconducting joints in real devices, and the temperature-dependent HTS joint resistance model can play an important role in giving early warnings of the over-current for HTS tapes and high-field magnets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据