4.2 Article

Early Wearing of Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthosis Improves Functional Prognosis in Patients after Stroke

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106261

关键词

Knee ankle foot orthosis; Functional prognosis; Stroke; Early exercise; Rehabilitation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study suggests that early wearing of knee-ankle-foot orthosis (KAFO) after stroke onset may have a positive impact on the improvement of activities of daily living (ADL) in patients.
Objectives: Knee-ankle-foot orthosis (KAFO) is sometimes used for gait training in stroke patients. The impact of the time of wearing KAFO on activities of daily living (ADL) recovery has not been clarified. This study aimed to examine the relationship between the days from onset to KAFO wearing and functional prognosis in patients after stroke. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, observational study was conducted with stroke patients who were prescribed a KAFO. Patients were divided into early and delayed groups according to the median days from onset to KAFO wearing. Baseline characteristics were evaluated at the initiation of KAFO wearing. The primary outcome was the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) gain, which was scored by the nurse at baseline and discharge. Results: 112 participants (mean age 67.9 +/- 14.0 years, 51.8% male) were included. The time period measure from day of onset to KAFO wearing for the early group was significantly shorter than the delayed group (35.8 +/- 6.6 days vs. 73.5 +/- 28.9 days). The early group had a higher FIM at discharge (84.9 +/- 28.0% vs. 65.1 +/- 29.0%, P < 0.001) and higher FIM gain (36.9 +/- 19.8% vs. 26.8 +/- 22.3, P = 0.013) than did the delayed group. Multiple regression analysis showed that the early group was associated with FIM gain (coefficient = 8.607, P = 0.032). Conclusions: Early wearing of KAFO, irrespective of the difference in ADL at the time of KAFO wearing, may have a positive impact on the improvement of ADL in patients after stroke.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据