4.6 Article

Proton conduction in two highly stable cadmium(II) metal-organic frameworks built by substituted imidazole dicarboxylates

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE CHEMISTRY
卷 309, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2022.122948

关键词

MOFs; Imidazole dicarboxylate; Proton conductivity; Mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, two metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) with high proton conductivity were synthesized using a multifunctional organic ligand. The MOFs demonstrated significant humidity- and temperature-dependence in their water-mediated proton conductivity, reaching a value above 10-4 S cm-1 under specific conditions. The H-bonded networks within the MOFs were found to be responsible for their enhanced proton conductivity.
Recently, the fabrication of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) with high proton conductivity (sigma) still attracts the attention of many researchers. Herein, a multifunctional organic ligand, 4-hydroxyphenyl-4,5-imidazole dicarboxylic acid (p-HOPhH3IDC) was adopted to solvothermally prepare two stable one-dimensional Cd(II) MOFs, {[Cd2(p-HOPhHIDC)2(phen)2]center dot H2O}n (1) (phen = 1,10-phenanthroline), {[Cd2(p-HOPhHIDC)2(2,2'-bipy)2]center dot H2O}n (2) (2, 2'-bipy = 2, 2'-bipyridine) in the presence of the N-containing ligands. Consequently, thermogravimetric analysis (TG), powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) determinations were employed to explore their structural stability. Importantly, their water-mediated proton conductivity demonstrated significant humidity- and temperature-dependence, increasing with the increase of both, and could attain the best value above 10-4 S cm-1 under 100 degrees C and 98% RH. The structural analyses along with the calculation of activation energy revealed that the rich H-bonded networks inside their frameworks are responsible for the higher proton conductivity. Finally, the proton-conducting mechanisms of the two MOFs were highlighted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据