4.7 Article

Catalytic combustion of toluene on Pt/Al2O3 and Pd/Al2O3 catalysts with CeO2, CeO2-Y2O3 and La2O3 as coatings

期刊

JOURNAL OF RARE EARTHS
卷 41, 期 8, 页码 1171-1178

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jre.2022.05.007

关键词

Volatile organic compounds; Catalytic oxidization; Pt; Rare earths; Carrier modification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CeO2, La2O3, and CeO2-Y2O3 oxides were coated on the surface of Al2O3 through impregnation method and showed improved performance as supports for Pd and Pt catalysts. The doping of rare earth metals increased the adsorption rates of Pd and Pt ions, and the Pt/Ce-Al2O3 and Pt/CeY-Al2O3 catalysts exhibited better degradation performance for toluene compared to Pt/Al2O3 catalyst. XPS characterization confirmed that Pt0 species played an important role in the catalytic oxidation reaction of toluene.
CeO2, La2O3, and CeO2-Y2O3 oxides were coated on the surface of spherical granular Al2O3 (3-5 mm) through impregnation method, and proved as better supports of Pd and Pt catalysts. The influences of rare earth metal doping on the adsorption rates of Pd and Pt ions, as well as the catalytic performance, were investigated. Results show that the H2PtCl6.6H2O adsorption rates of the Al2O3 carriers modified by Ce, La, and CeY increase significantly. These rare earth coatings can adsorb almost all H2PtCl6.6H2O in the solution. Compared with Pt/Al2O3 catalyst, Pt/Ce-Al2O3 and Pt/CeY-Al2O3 catalysts have better degra-dation performance for toluene, and the T90 temperatures are both about 147 & DEG;C. According to X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) characterization, Pt0 is an important active species for catalytic oxidation reaction of toluene. After CeO2 modification to the conventional Pt/Al2O3 catalyst, the pro-portion of Pt0 increases from 74.5% to 82.1%. When the Pt0 content in the metal state is improved, the redox activity of the catalyst is promoted correspondingly.& COPY; 2022 Chinese Society of Rare Earths. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据