4.7 Article

Putting Humpty Dumpty Back Together Again: What Does Protein Quantification Mean in Bottom-Up Proteomics?

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 891-898

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.1c00894

关键词

quantitative proteomics; proteoforms; post-translational modifications; quantitative analysis; protein grouping

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [U19AG065156, RF1AG053959, P41GM103533, F31AG069420, P41GM108569, UH3CA246635, R35GM126914]
  2. Swedish Research Council [2017-04030]
  3. PNNL [U01-1CA184783]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC0676RL01830]
  5. [R13AG057087]
  6. Swedish Research Council [2017-04030] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional proteomics methods aggregate peptide quantities into protein groups, potentially overlooking important biological differences between different components. Therefore, it is necessary to reconsider the practice of aggregating protein values to a single quantity in order to capture the contributions of existing proteoforms.
Bottom-up proteomics provides peptide measurements and has beeninvaluable for moving proteomics into large-scale analyses. Commonly, a singlequantitative value is reported for each protein-coding gene by aggregating peptidequantities into protein groups following protein inference or parsimony. However, giventhe complexity of both RNA splicing and post-translational protein modification, it isoverly simplistic to assume that all peptides that map to a singular protein-coding genewill demonstrate the same quantitative response. By assuming that all peptides from aprotein-coding sequence are representative of the same protein, we may miss thediscovery of important biological differences. To capture the contributions of existingproteoforms, we need to reconsider the practice of aggregating protein values to a singlequantity per protein-coding gene.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据