4.3 Article

Cognitive preceptorship: An emerging nurse practitioner role transition to practice model

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING
卷 39, 期 -, 页码 194-205

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.02.002

关键词

Model; Nurse practitioner; Role transition; Transition to practice; Advanced clinical nursing education; Preceptorship

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces the application of the Cognitive Preceptorship Model in the nurse practitioner role transition process, and highlights the need for restructuring of the preceptorship system.
Background: Transition to practice is difficult for nurse practitioners (NP) pre and post-graduation. At the core of NPs' successful transition to practice is clinical education. There is a lack of theoretical knowledge to guide NPs' transition to practice through preceptorship. The current academic clinical education model and onboarding process in clinical settings require restructuring. Preceptorship is the most important element of NPs' transition to practice; it is in need of restructuring. There is a need for evidence to guide the restructuring of pre and postgraduation NP preceptorship. Aim: This paper aims to provide a description and application of the Cognitive Preceptorship Model to the nurse practitioner role transition process. Method: An extensive literature review of NPs' preceptorship during role transition was conducted and the Cognitive Preceptorship Model (CPM) derived from the literature review of other theories and models: the Schlossberg's Transition Theory; Collins et al. Cognitive Apprenticeship Model;. and Barnes's NP transition attributes. The CPM model's concepts and application to practice are described; included is a description of preceptorship, CPM model origination, as well as CPM model concepts and application. Conclusion: The CPM model's concepts guide the specific application of the preceptorship process to both NP students and novice NPs' transition to practice pre and post-graduation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据