4.8 Article

Mathematical framework for total cost of ownership analysis of marine electrical energy storage inspired by circular economy

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 528, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231164

关键词

Lithium-ion battery; Marine; Second life; Life-cycle cost; Recycling; Circular economy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper develops a mathematical model for considering the circular economy in the life cycle costs in the maritime sector. The main finding of the study is that battery material circulation can be conducted in all phases over the lifetime of the marine application and clear revenue streams are identified. However, it is also concluded that material circulation requires more technological, procedural, and industrial innovations during the coming years.
The strongly growing uptake of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) in transportation requires environmentally sustainable ways to treat spent batteries. Novel material circulation processes establish material flows which create significant business opportunities and new jobs and welfare. This paper develops a mathematical model for considering the circular economy in the life cycle costs in the maritime sector. Current articles and models do not quantify economic gains from the LIB circular economy, especially in the marine sector. An additional challenge is that the typical planned lifetime is 30 years which means that the battery energy storage of a ship needs to be retrofitted 1-3 times over the ship's lifetime. The analysis herein considers the cost evolution of ESS during the coming decades to estimate retrofit battery costs and re-use economics. The main finding of the study is that battery material circulation can be conducted in all phases over the lifetime of the marine application and clear revenue streams are identified. These are not only deceasing the costs for battery investment, but are also able to bring revenues, leading to commercially viable reuse of batteries. However, it is also concluded that material circulation requires more technological, procedural, and industrial innovations during the coming years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据