4.4 Article

Chain scission by ultrasonication of polycaprolactone with different initial molecular weight and concentration

期刊

JOURNAL OF POLYMER RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10965-022-02982-y

关键词

Polycaprolactone; Biodegradable polymer; Molecular weight; Polymer scission; Ultrasonication

资金

  1. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia [FP038-2020]
  2. University of Malaya [UM.C/625/1/HIR/MOHE/05]
  3. Impact-Oriented Interdisciplinary Research Grant [IIRG017A-2019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultrasonication was used to study the scission of different commercially available polycaprolactone (PCL) with varying initial molecular weights. The results showed that the size reduction and polydispersity index changes of the sonicated PCL samples depended on their initial molecular weight and effective concentration. The scission event involved an unzipping mechanism driven by forces associated with sonication energy dissipation. Further scission of the generated fragments was no longer possible below a limiting molecular weight for the designated PCL.
Ultrasonication-mediated scission of three commercially available polycaprolactone (PCL) with different initial molecular weights (designated as low-, intermediate- and high-IMW PCL) was investigated. Each IMW PCL solution at different concentrations were subjected to sonication intervals. Scission-induced molecular size reduction, polydispersity index alteration, and a limiting molecular weight of the sonicated PCL samples depend on their initial molecular weight and effective concentration, whereby interaction forces play an important role. epsilon-caprolactone was identified post-scission event. It is hypothesized that a single scission event occurs at the upward/downward vicinity to the mid-point of the chain involving unzipping mechanism, driven by known forces associated with sonication energy dissipation. Further scission event of the generated fragment is no longer feasible below a limiting molecular weight for the designated IMW PCL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据