4.5 Article

Clinical Conversion or Reversion of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Community versus Hospital Based Studies: GDEMCIS (Gwangju Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment Study) and CREDOS (Clinical Research Center for Dementia of South Korea)

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
卷 53, 期 2, 页码 463-473

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-160341

关键词

Clinical conversion; community; dementia; hospital; mild cognitive impairment; reversion; recruitment source

资金

  1. Korea Health 21 R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI10C2020]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant - Korean Government (MSIP) [2015R1A5A7037630]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: In keeping with increasing interest in dementia, few recent studies suggest that clinical course of mild cognitive impairment vary across different studies with hospital-based subjects showing higher rates of conversion than community-based subjects. Objective: The main objective of the present study was to assess whether the clinical conversion or reversion rates differ according to recruitment source. Methods: The baseline study subjects comprised of patients who were diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment in community-based GDEMCIS or hospital-based CREDOS. The two studies had nearly the same protocol and were performed over a similar period. We used propensity score matching for baseline comparability. After that, Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were conducted to estimate the hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of clinical conversion or reversion. Results: Based on 89 GDEMCIS subjects, 1:4 propensity score matching was conducted and 356 CREDOS subjects were selected. After adjusting for covariates including baseline demographics, comorbidity, depression, disability, and neuropsychological result, Cox proportional hazard regression analysis for time to clinical conversion indicated that recruitment from hospital-based CREDOS exhibited hazard ratio of 2.13 ( 95% CI, 1.08-4.21), as compared to recruitment from community-based GDEMCIS. Similarly, Cox proportional hazard regression analysis for time to reversion indicated that recruitment from hospital-based CREDOS exhibited hazard ratio of 0.34 ( 95% CI, 0.20-0.59), as compared to recruitment from community-based GDEMCIS. Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that even after the matching process and adjustments for baseline covariates, recruitment source greatly affected the course of mild cognitive impairment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据