4.2 Article

Carbon K-edge x-ray emission spectroscopy of gas phase ethylenic molecules

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6455/ac4e66

关键词

x-ray emission; spectroscopy; x-ray spectroscopy; quantum chemistry

资金

  1. swiss NSF via the NCCR:MUST
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant [860553]
  3. Carl Tryggers Foundation [CTS18:285]
  4. Swedish Research Council [2018-05973]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reports on the C K-edge X-ray absorption spectra and resonant and non-resonant X-ray emission spectra of ethylene, allene, and butadiene in the gas phase. The results show clear differences between the spectra of different molecules, with more structured spectra observed for ethylene and allene compared to butadiene. The authors used density functional theory calculations to simulate the spectra and successfully identified the spectral features as transitions involving localized 1s orbitals. The implications of these findings for ultrafast X-ray studies of polyatomic molecules passing through conical intersections are discussed.
We report on the C K-edge x-ray absorption spectra and the resonant (RXES) and non-resonant (NXES) x-ray emission spectra of ethylene, allene and butadiene in the gas phase. The RXES and NXES show clear differences for the different molecules. Overall both types of spectra are more structured for ethylene and allene, than for butadiene. Using density functional theory-restricted open shell configuration interaction single calculations, we simulate the spectra with remarkable agreement with the experiment. We identify the spectral features as being due to transitions involving localised 1s orbitals. For allene, there are distinct spectral bands that reflect transitions predominantly from either the central or terminal carbon atoms. These results are discussed in the context of ultrafast x-ray studies aimed at detecting the passage through conical intersections in polyatomic molecules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据