4.6 Article

Optimization landscape in the simplest constrained random least-square problem

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8121/ac6d8e

关键词

random landscapes; random optimization; random matrices

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/V002473/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we analyze the statistical features of the 'optimization landscape' in a basic constrained optimization problem and derive the exact expressions for key metrics of the problem. These findings provide important insights for solving the problem numerically.
We analyze statistical features of the 'optimization landscape' in a random version of one of the simplest constrained optimization problems of the least-square type: finding the best approximation for the solution of a system of M linear equations in N unknowns: (a(k), x)= b(k), k = 1, . . . , M on the N-sphere x(2) = N. We treat both the N-component vectors ak and parameters bk as independent mean zero real Gaussian random variables. First, we derive the exact expressions for the mean number of stationary points of the least-square loss function in the overcomplete case M > N in the framework of the Kac-Rice approach combined with the random matrix theory for Wishart ensemble. Then we perform its asymptotic analysis as N -> infinity at a fixed alpha = M/N > 1 in various regimes. In particular, this analysis allows to extract the large deviation function for the density of the smallest Lagrange multiplier lambda(min) associated with the problem, and in this way to find its most probable value. This can be further used to predict the asymptotic mean minimal value epsilon(min) of the loss function as N -> infinity. Finally, we develop an alternative approach based on the replica trick to conjecture the form of the large deviation function for the density of epsilon(min) at N >> 1 and any fixed ratio alpha = M/N > 0. As a by-product, we find the compatibility threshold alpha(c) < 1 which is the value of a beyond which a large random linear system on the N-sphere becomes typically incompatible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据