4.6 Article

Large deviations analysis for random combinatorial partitions with counter terms

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8121/ac6f32

关键词

random partitions; large deviations; empirical cycle counts; variational formula; pressure representation; Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC); Huang-Yang-Luttinger model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper studies models for random combinatorial partitions and their limiting free energies, with a focus on the minimizer of various Gibbsian ensembles. Critical behavior is observed in models with unique minimizers for rate functions, including the probabilistic version of the Huang-Yang-Luttinger model.
In this paper, we study various models for random combinatorial partitions using large deviation analysis for diverging scale of the reference process. The large deviation rate functions are normalised limiting free energies and the main focus is to study their minimiser for various Gibbsian ensembles with respect to the reference measure which is a probabilistic version of the ideal Bose gas. Scaling limits of similar models have been studied recently (Fatkullin and Slastikov 2018 arXiv:1801.00812v2; Faticullin and Xue 2021 J. Stat. Phys. 183 22) going back to (Vershik 1996 Func. Anal. Appl. 30 90-105). After studying the reference model, we provide a complete analysis of two mean field models, one of which is well-know (Benfatto et al 2005 J. Math. Phys. 46 033303) and the other one is the cycle mean field model. Both models show critical behaviour despite their rate functions having unique minimiser. The main focus is then a model with negative counter term, the probabilistic version of the so-called Huang-Yang-Luttinger model (van den Berg et al 1988 Commun. Math. Phys. 118 61-85). Criticality in this model is the existence of a critical parameter for which two simultaneous minimiser exists. At criticality an order parameter is introduced as the double limits for the density of cycles with diverging length, and as such it extends recent work in (Adams and Dickson 2021 Ann. Henri Poincare 22 1535-60).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据