4.6 Article

A branching random-walk model of disease outbreaks and the percolation backbone

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8121/ac6716

关键词

branching random-walk; SIR model; backbone percolation

资金

  1. FAPERJ
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  3. CAPES

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The size and shape of the affected region play a crucial role in understanding disease dynamics and organizing future actions. This study explores a modified SIR model where agents diffuse on a lattice, and disease transmission occurs between infected and susceptible agents that are nearest neighbors. The research investigates the geometric properties of the outbreak and unvisited clusters, finding a hybrid transition separating a finite outbreak cluster from one that percolates through the system. Additionally, the outbreak cluster exhibits similar behavior to the critical cluster of ordinary percolation, while clusters with unvisited sites have a size distribution with a Fisher exponent tau < 2.
The size and shape of the region affected by an outbreak is relevant to understand the dynamics of a disease and help to organize future actions to mitigate similar events. A simple extension of the SIR model is considered, where agents diffuse on a regular lattice and the disease may be transmitted when an infected and a susceptible agents are nearest neighbors. We study the geometric properties of both the connected cluster of sites visited by infected agents (outbreak cluster) and the set of clusters with sites that have not been visited. By changing the density of agents, our results show that there is a mixed-order (hybrid) transition separating a phase where the outbreak cluster is finite from the other one where it percolates through the system. Moreover, the outbreak cluster seems to have the same exponents of the backbone of the critical cluster of the ordinary percolation while the clusters with unvisited sites have a size distribution with a Fisher exponent tau < 2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据