4.8 Article

Wedge-Based Design for Phase Stable and Phase Accurate Heterodyne-Detected Sum-Frequency Generation Spectroscopy

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 13, 期 9, 页码 2072-2077

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c04175

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy [EXC 2033 -390677874 - RESOLV]
  2. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phase sensitive and heterodyne-detected sum-frequency generation spectroscopy provides the ability to separate the nonlinear susceptibility into real and imaginary components. It also offers information about the absolute orientation of molecules at interfaces and produces a linear absorptive spectrum that can be easily decomposed into different spectral components. However, maintaining both phase accuracy and phase stability is still a challenge. In this study, a new experimental design incorporating a wedge pair is introduced to accurately control the timing between the local oscillator and the sample signal, resulting in high phase accuracy and long-term stability in a compact and flexible configuration.
Phase sensitive and heterodyne-detected (HD) sum-frequency generation (SFG) spectroscopy offers the ability to separate the nonlinear susceptibility into its real and imaginary components. This provides information about the absolute orientation of molecules at interfaces while also producing an absorptive spectrum that is linear in spectral composition and can easily be decomposed into different spectral components. However, simultaneously obtaining phase accuracy and phase stability remains a challenge in SFG. Here we present a new experimental design for HD-SFG spectroscopy that incorporates a wedge pair to accurately control the timing between the local oscillator and the sample signal. This experimental approach provides high phase accuracy and long-time phase stability in a compact and flexible configuration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据