4.8 Article

Are Metal Halide Perovskite Solar Cells Ready for SpaceApplications?

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 13, 期 13, 页码 2908-2920

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c00386

关键词

-

资金

  1. Centre of Materials Science, Queensland University of Technology, Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP 190102580, DP 210102252]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The appeal of metal halide perovskite solar cells (PSCs) lies in their excellent optical and electrical properties, as well as their compatibility with flexible substrates. These lightweight solar cell devices hold the highest record of specific power, indicating great potential for space applications. However, PSCs face challenges in space environments due to radiation and thermal cycling. This Perspective provides a brief summary of research on PSCs for space applications, discussing their radiation tolerance, thermal stability, and fundamental mechanisms, while highlighting the key challenges in future space applications and the prospect of PSCs as the next frontier in space PV technology.
The appeal of metal halide perovskite solar cells (PSCs) has been widelydemonstrated in thefield of photovoltaic technology. On account of the excellent opticaland electrical properties, as well as compatibility withflexible substrates, the PSCs alsohold the highest record of specific power for lightweight solar cell devices, suggestingexcellent promise in space applications. Hence, there is increasing interest in theperformance of PSCs in space environments where radiation beams and thermal cyclingcan cause extreme stress on the devices. In this Perspective, we provide a brief summary ofthe research on PSCs for space applications. The radiation tolerance and thermal stabilityof PSCs and the fundamental mechanisms are discussed and analyzed. Key challengesfacing PSC technology toward future space applications are demonstrated. ThisPerspective features the prospect of PSCs as the next frontier in space PV technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据