4.6 Article

Direct Spectroscopic Quantification of the Absorption and Scattering Properties for Single Aerosol Particles

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 126, 期 9, 页码 1571-1577

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.2c00532

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Aerosol Science [EP/S023593/1]
  2. NERC [NE/S014314/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the optical properties of micrometer-scale light-absorbing aerosol particles is crucial for addressing key challenges in atmospheric and physical chemistry. This study demonstrates a new approach using cavity ring-down spectroscopy to directly quantify the continuously evolving absorption and scattering cross sections of single, levitated, micrometer-scale particles as their size and chromophore concentration change.
Understanding the optical properties of micrometer-scale light-absorbing aerosol particles is of paramount importance in addressing key challenges in atmospheric and physical chemistry. For example, the absorption of solar radiation by atmospheric aerosols represents one of the largest uncertainties in climate models. Moreover, reaction acceleration within the unique environments of aerosol droplets cannot be replicated in bulk solutions. The causes of these reaction rate enhancements remain controversial, but ultra -sensitive spectroscopic measurements of evolving aerosol optical properties should provide new insights. We demonstrate a new approach using cavity ring-down spectroscopy that allows the first direct spectroscopic quantification of the continuously evolving absorption and scattering cross sections for single, levitated, micrometer-scale particles as their size and chromophore concentration change. For two-component droplets composed of nigrosin and 1,2,6-hexanetriol, the unprecedented sensitivity of our measurements reveals the evolving real and imaginary components of the refractive index caused by changes in concentration as 1,2,6-hexanetriol slowly evaporates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据