4.6 Article

Theoretical investigation of the influence of π-spacer on photovoltaic performances in carbazole-based dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells applications

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2022.113870

关键词

Dye-sensitized solar cells; Organic dyes; DFT; TD-DFT; Optoelectronic properties; Carbazole

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of different π-spacer groups on the efficiency of metal-free organic dyes in DSSCs was studied. Theoretical calculations showed that changing the π-spacer group can improve the performance of the dyes, including open-circuit photovoltage, light absorption ability, and intramolecular charge transfer properties.
A series of D-A-pi-A metal-free organic dyes (D-i, i = 1-8) have been taken into account to study the influence of different it-spacer groups on their efficiency in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). Density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) methods have been used to investigate the geometrical structures, absorption properties, molecular electrostatic potential, and some important parameters in relation with the short-circuit current density (J(SC)) and the open-circuit photovoltage (V-OC), such as nonlinear optical properties (NLO), light-harvesting efficiency (LHE), electron injection driving force (delta G(inject)), total reorganization energy (lambda(total)), and chemical reactivity. The results of theoretical calculations of these dyes showed that the variation of pi-spacer group could increase the open-circuit photovoltage, enhance light absorption ability and intramolecular charge transfer properties, reduce energy gap, thus leading to improved photovoltaic performance. In addition, the effects of the dyes adsorption on TiO2 surface, absorption spectra and energy levels were evaluated. Accordingly, we can assume that this theoretical investigation is predictable to provide guidance for experimental synthesis of greatly efficient metal-free organic dyes based on carbazole for DSSC applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据