4.7 Article

Solar photocatalytic degradation of sulfanilamide by BiOCl/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites: Mechanism and degradation pathways

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 663, 期 -, 页码 1-9

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.12.027

关键词

BiOCl/RGO; Sulfanilamide; Natural sunlight; Photocatalytic; Mechanism

资金

  1. Key Science and Technology Program of Henan Province, PR China [132102210129]
  2. Basic Scientific and Technological Frontier Project of Henan Province, PR China [132330410138, 122300410293]
  3. Plan for Scientific Innovation Talent of Henan Province [134200510014]
  4. Fostering Foundation of Henan Normal University for the Author of National Excellent Ph.D. Dissertation, PR China [01333900011]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21477034]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flower-like bismuth oxychloride (BiOCl) catalysts were synthesized with a facile hydrolysis reaction, where the synthesized BiOCl products were further decorated with the prepared graphene oxide (GO) to form novel BiOCl/reduced graphene oxide (BiOCl/RGO) composites. The as-synthesized materials were well characterized with the aid of various techniques, before they were used as photocatalysts for the degradation of sulfanilamide (SN) aqueous solution. The BiOCl/RGO composites contained 1 wt% RGO exhibited superior photocatalytic response, where the degradation rate of SN at 82.7% stayed 30% higher than that of pure BiOCl. The enhanced photocatalytic performances of BiOCl/RGO composites were neither related to the surface area values nor the bandgap of the fabricated photocatalysts, but associated with the enhanced visible light absorption and advanced electron transfer ability. On a basis of the analysis on the SN intermediate products by HPLC, IC, FTIR, H-1 NMR, C-13 NMR and MS, the degradation pathway of SN was speculated, where it was confirmed that the main intermediate product of SN was sulfanilic acid. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据