4.5 Article

A red-emission iridium ( III ) complex-based fluorescent probe with Schiff base structure for selection detection HOCl and its application in water sample

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORGANOMETALLIC CHEMISTRY
卷 976, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2022.122351

关键词

Iridium; Fluorescent probe; HOC

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21701065, 41867053]
  2. Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation [20212BAB213013]
  3. Young Talents Project of Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University [2019QNBJRC005]
  4. innovation found of graduate student [YC2020-X08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A probe based on an iridium complex was developed for quantitative detection of HOCl, demonstrating excellent performance in the experiments.
Hypochlorous acid (HOCl), a kind of reactive oxygen species (ROS), has been reported to be related to many human diseases, such as Parkinson's diseases, arthritis and cancers. Herein, a red-emission Ir(III) complex-based probe 1 for quantitative detection of HOCl was prepared and characterized by 1 H and 13 C NMR, IR and HRMS. For probe 1, benzenesulfonylhydrazine group was introduced to the main N<^>C ligands phenylpyridine to quench fluorescence due to the isomerization of C = N bond. After reaction with HOCl in 30% DMF/PBS solution, the benzenesulfonylhydrazine group was taken offand fluorescent complex Ir-CHO was generated. The fluorescence intensity at 625 nm was significantly enhanced, and finally increased by 23 times. The experiment results demonstrated that probe 1 possessed large Stokes shift (ca. 195 nm), low detection limit (1.3728 x10(-6) M), fast response (25 s), and high selectivity toward HOCl without interference from other ions and bio-related species. In addition, probe 1 exhibited good stability and water solubility. Moreover, it could be further applied in actual water for quantitative detection of HOCl with high recovery rate (95% - 101%). (c) 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据