4.7 Article

Cobalt-Catalyzed Regioselectivepara-Amination of Azobenzenesvia Nucleophilic Aromatic Substitution of Hydrogen

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 87, 期 7, 页码 4724-4731

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.2c00026

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFA0704502]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21931011, 22071241, 22071243]
  3. Fujian Science & Technology Innovation Laboratory for Optoelectronic Information of China [2021ZZ105]
  4. Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDJ-SSWSLH024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work describes the development of an unprecedented cobalt-catalyzed para-selective amination of azobenzenes, which demonstrated the concept of electrophilic activation of the arene ring toward SNArH through coordination of the substituent on the arene ring to the metal catalyst. The reaction showed broad substrate scope, good yields, and regioselectivity for para-amination.
The metal-catalyzed nucleophilic aromatic substitu-tion of hydrogen (SNArH) via coordination of the substituent onthe aromatic ring to the metal catalyst, in terms of reactivity,substrate type, and reaction selectivity, complements the transitionmetal-catalyzed C-H functionalization that proceeds via C-Hmetalation but remains an elusive target. Described herein is thedevelopment of an unprecedented cobalt-catalyzedpara-selectiveamination of azobenzenes, which is essentially a metal-promotedSNArH process as revealed by Hammett analysis, thus illustrating the concept that coordination of the substituent on the arene ringto the metal catalyst may result in electrophilic activation of the arene ring toward SNArH. This cobalt-catalyzed protocol allows theuse of a variety of both aliphatic amines and anilines as aminating reagents, tolerates electronically diverse substituents ofazobenzene, and furnishes the corresponding products in good yields with a regiospecific selectivity forpara-amination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据