4.7 Article

Growth of ultrathin Ni-Co-Al layered double hydroxide on reduced graphene oxide and superb supercapacitive performance of the resulting composite

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 678, 期 -, 页码 93-101

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.293

关键词

Layered double hydroxide; Reduced graphene oxide; Composite electrode materials; Hydrothermal method; Supercapacitive performance

资金

  1. Opening Project of CAS Key Laboratory of Materials for Energy Conversion
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Education Commission of Anhui Province [KJ2012A045]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultrathin Ni-Co-Al layered double hydroxide (LDH) sheets directly grew on reduced graphene oxide (RGO) nanosheets by a facile hydrothermal route in a mixed solvent of water and ethylene glycol, yielding the RGO/Ni0.75-xCoxAl0.25-LDH (x = 0, 0.05, 0.15) composites. Structural analyses revealed that the resulting composites presented a unique morphology of crumpled silk veil waves, in which the ultrathin Ni0.75-xCoxAl0.25-LDH sheets, composed of 2-3 host layers, were entangled with the rippled RGO nanosheets. Electrochemical analyses demonstrated that the RGO/Ni0.70Co0.05Al0.25-LDH composite showed superior supercapacitive performance, as compared with the pure Ni0.70Co0.05Al0.25-LDH and the RGO/Ni0.75-xCoxAl0.25-LDH (x = 0, 0.15) composites. It exhibited not only ultrahigh cycling stability and good rate capability, but also considerably high specific capacitance. It possessed a high specific capacitance of 1544 F g(-1) at current densities of 1 A g(-1), still delivering a high capacitance of 1081 F g(-1) at an increased current density of 40 A g(-1). After cycled at 10 A g(-1) for 2000 cycles, it retained a capacitance of 1343 F g(-1) without capacitance decay observed. The superb supercapacitive performance along with the facile synthesis method adopted suggested that the RGO/Ni0.70Co0.05Al0.25-LDH composite was promising for supercapacitor applications. (C) 2016 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据