4.5 Article

Oracle Complexity Separation in Convex Optimization

期刊

JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS
卷 193, 期 1-3, 页码 462-490

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10957-022-02038-7

关键词

First-order methods; Convex optimization; Complexity; Random coordinate descent; Stochastic gradient

资金

  1. Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation [000000D730321P5Q0002]
  2. Ivannikov Institute for System Programming of the Russian Academy of Sciences [70-2021-00142]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a generic algorithmic framework for convex optimization problems, which separates oracle complexities for different functions and oracle types.
Many convex optimization problems have structured objective functions written as a sum of functions with different oracle types (e.g., full gradient, coordinate derivative, stochastic gradient) and different arithmetic operations complexity of these oracles. In the strongly convex case, these functions also have different condition numbers that eventually define the iteration complexity of first-order methods and the number of oracle calls required to achieve a given accuracy. Motivated by the desire to call more expensive oracles fewer times, we consider the problem of minimizing the sum of two functions and propose a generic algorithmic framework to separate oracle complexities for each function. The latter means that the oracle for each function is called the number of times that coincide with the oracle complexity for the case when the second function is absent. Our general accelerated framework covers the setting of (strongly) convex objectives, the setting when both parts are given through full coordinate oracle, as well as when one of them is given by coordinate derivative oracle or has the finite-sum structure and is available through stochastic gradient oracle. In the latter two cases, we obtain accelerated random coordinate descent and accelerated variance reduced methods with oracle complexity separation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据