4.5 Article

The Stochastic Bilevel Continuous Knapsack Problem with Uncertain Follower's Objective

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10957-022-02037-8

关键词

Bilevel optimization; Stochastic optimization; Complexity

资金

  1. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We consider a stochastic version of a bilevel continuous knapsack problem, where the leader aims to optimize the expected value of a linear objective function while the follower's profits are uncertain. We show that the stochastic problem is tractable when the possible scenarios are explicitly given, and provide pseudo-polynomial time algorithms for the case of independently and uniformly distributed item values.
We consider a bilevel continuous knapsack problem where the leader controls the capacity of the knapsack, while the follower chooses a feasible packing maximizing his own profit. The leader's aim is to optimize a linear objective function in the capacity and in the follower's solution, but with respect to different item values. We address a stochastic version of this problem where the follower's profits are uncertain from the leader's perspective, and only a probability distribution is known. Assuming that the leader aims at optimizing the expected value of her objective function, we first observe that the stochastic problem is tractable as long as the possible scenarios are given explicitly as part of the input, which also allows to deal with general distributions using a sample average approximation. For the case of independently and uniformly distributed item values, we show that the problem is #P-hard in general, and the same is true even for evaluating the leader's objective function. Nevertheless, we present pseudo-polynomial time algorithms for this case, running in time linear in the total size of the items. Based on this, we derive an additive approximation scheme for the general case of independently distributed item values, which runs in pseudo-polynomial time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据