4.7 Article

Impact of ComBat Harmonization on PET Radiomics-Based Tissue Classification: A Dual-Center PET/MRI and PET/CT Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
卷 63, 期 10, 页码 1611-1616

出版社

SOC NUCLEAR MEDICINE INC
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263102

关键词

PET; MRI; radiomics; harmonization

资金

  1. NIH/NCI Cancer Center [P30 CA008748]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether ComBat harmonization improves tissue classification based on 18F-FDG PET radiomics. The results showed that ComBat harmonization can enhance the accuracy of various feature classes in pooled PET/MRI and PET/CT data.
Our purpose was to determine whether ComBat harmonization improves 18F-FDG PET radiomics-based tissue classification in pooled PET/MRI and PET/CT datasets.Methods: Two hundred patients who had undergone 18F-FDG PET/MRI (2 scanners and vendors; 50 patients each) or PET/CT (2 scanners and vendors; 50 patients each) were retrospectively included. Gray-level histogram, gray-level cooc-currence matrix, gray-level run-length matrix, gray-level size-zone matrix, and neighborhood gray-tone difference matrix radiomic fea-tures were calculated for volumes of interest in the disease-free liver, spleen, and bone marrow. For individual feature classes and a multi -class radiomic signature, tissue was classified on ComBat-harmonized and unharmonized pooled data, using a multilayer perceptron neural network.Results: Median accuracies in training and validation data -sets were 69.5% and 68.3% (harmonized), respectively, versus 59.5% and 58.9% (unharmonized), respectively, for gray-level histogram; 92.1% and 86.1% (harmonized), respectively, versus 53.6% and 50.0% (unharmonized), respectively, for gray-level cooccurrence matrix; 84.8% and 82.8% (harmonized), respectively, versus 62.4% and 58.3% (unharmonized), respectively, for gray-level run-length matrix; 87.6% and 85.6% (harmonized), respectively, versus 56.2% and 52.8% (unharmonized), respectively, for gray-level size-zone matrix; 79.5% and 77.2% (harmonized), respectively, versus 54.8% and 53.9% (unharmonized), respectively, for neighborhood gray-tone difference matrix; and 86.9% and 84.4% (harmonized), respectively, versus 62.9% and 58.3% (unharmonized), respectively, for radiomic signature. Conclusion: ComBat harmonization may be useful for mul-ticenter 18F-FDG PET radiomics studies using pooled PET/MRI and PET/CT data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据