4.7 Article

High temperature oxidation behavior of an equimolar refractory metal-based alloy 20Nb-20Mo-20Cr-20Ti-20Al with and without Si addition

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 688, 期 -, 页码 468-477

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.07.219

关键词

High-entropy alloys; Refractory elements; High-temperature oxidation

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The high temperature oxidation behavior of a refractory high-entropy alloy (HEA) 20Nb-20Mo-20Cr-20Ti-20Al at 900 degrees C, 1000 degrees C and 1100 degrees C was investigated. The oxidation kinetics of the alloy was found to be linear at all temperatures. Oxide scales formed are largely inhomogeneous showing regions with thick and porous layers as well areas with quite thin oxide scales due to formation of discontinuous chromium-rich oxide scales. However, the oxidation resistance can be moderately improved by the addition of 1 at.% Si. The thermogravimetric data obtained during oxidation of the Si-containing alloy at 1000 degrees C and 1100 degrees C reveal pronounced periods of parabolic oxidation that, however, change towards linear oxidation after prolonged exposure times. Microstructural investigations using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) document that the Si addition gives rise to a nearly continuous alumina-rich layer which seems to be responsible for the good protection against further oxidation. Pronounced zones of internal corrosion attacks consisting of different oxides and nitrides were observed in both alloys. In order to determine the chemical composition of the corrosion products and their mass fraction, quantitative X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was performed on powdered oxide scales that formed on the alloys after different oxidation times. Rutile was identified as the major phase in the oxide scales rationalizing the relatively high mass gain during oxidation. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据