4.7 Article

Dielectric properties and defect chemistry of La and Tb co-doped BaTiO3 ceramics

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 681, 期 -, 页码 128-138

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.04.119

关键词

Ceramics; Mixed-valence; Defect complexes; Dielectric response; Electron paramagnetic resonance; X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundations of China [21271084]
  2. National Natural Science Foundations of Jilin Province [20160101290JC]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

(Ba1-xLax)(Ti1-xTbx)O-3 (0.03 <= x <= 0.20) (BLTT) and (Ba1-xLax)(Ti1-xTbx)O-3-0.03nTb(x = 0.03, n = 0, 1, 3, 5, 7) (BL3TT-nT) ceramics were prepared using a mixed oxides method. The structure, microstructure, dielectric properties, valence state, and defect chemistry of BLTT and BL3TT-nT were investigated using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and dielectric temperature and frequency measurements. The solid solution limits of Tb in BLTT and BL3TT-nT were determined by XRD to be x = 0.15 and n = 3, respectively. The incorporation of the extra Tb ions in BLTT enhanced the relative density of the ceramic from 84% to 96%, accompanied by an improvement in dielectric permittivity. The defect chemistry of BLTT is discussed. Tb ions coexist in mixed-valence states, at the Ba-site as Tb3+, and at the Ti-site as Tb3+/Tb4+. The dielectric-peak temperature (T-m) decreased linearly at a rate of -19 degrees C/%(La-Tb) for BLTT. Due to its higher room-temperature permittivity (epsilon' = 2450) and lower loss (tan delta = 0.029), BLTT with x = 0.07 can be considered as a promising dielectric for X7U applications. The existence of a small number of metastable Tb4+ ions at Ti-sites and the predominant presence of La3+-Tb3+ complexes at double sites are both responsible for the lower tan delta of BLTT. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据