4.7 Article

Oxygen-deficient non-crystalline tungsten oxide thin films for solar-driven water oxidation

期刊

JOURNAL OF NON-CRYSTALLINE SOLIDS
卷 580, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.121409

关键词

Tungsten oxide; Oxygen vacancy; DC reactive sputtering; Thin films; Water oxidation

资金

  1. Interdisciplinary Research Center for Hydrogen and Energy Storage (IRC-HES), King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM)
  2. Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM) [DF181021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The preparation of non-crystalline tungsten oxide films using DC reactive sputtering technique with controlled oxygen flow rate was reported. The study revealed a correlation between photoelectrocatalytic activity, optical band gap, morphology, and oxygen content of the non-stoichiometric films.
The preparation of metal oxide semiconductors in non-stoichiometric (oxygen-deficient) form can lead to sig-nificant change in their optical and electronic properties, and hence affect the photoelectrochemical perfor-mance. The controlled introduction of oxygen vacancy can improve the charge separation and increases the charge carrier density, which can significantly contribute to the enhancement of photoelectrocatalytic activity. Herein, we report fabrication of non-crystalline tungsten oxide films from metallic tungsten target using DC reactive sputtering technique. The oxygen flow rate was regulated to control the composition, structure and morphology of the films. The as-prepared films are amorphous in nature with distinct surface morphology and optical properties. The presence of oxygen vacancies were confirmed by the surface analysis. The non-stoichiometric films were evaluated for PEC performance by monitoring the water oxidation reaction under the UV-visible radiation. The findings reveal a correlation between photoelectrocatalytic activity, optical band gap, morphology, and, more importantly, oxygen content of the films.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据