4.4 Article

Designing and comparing cleaning pipelines for TMS-EEG data: A theoretical overview and practical example

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
卷 371, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2022.109494

关键词

Transcranial magnetic stimulation; TMS; Electroencephalography; EEG; Cleaning; Pipelines; Artifacts; TMS-evoked potentials; TEPs; ICA; SOUND

资金

  1. Australian Research Council, Australia [DP170100738, DE180100741]
  2. Academy of Finland, Finland [321631]
  3. Academy of Finland (AKA) [321631, 321631] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)
  4. Australian Research Council [DE180100741] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Combining transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with electroencephalography (EEG) is a popular method for studying neural circuits. However, measuring neural responses to TMS using EEG is challenging due to unique artifacts. This paper reviews these artifacts and offline cleaning methods. Open science practices and open-source toolboxes have improved the availability and reproducibility of cleaning methods. The choice of cleaning pipeline affects TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs), highlighting the need for validation and comparison of cleaning methods.
Combining transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with electroencephalography (EEG) is growing in popularity as a method for probing the reactivity and connectivity of neural circuits in basic and clinical research. However, using EEG to measure the neural responses to TMS is challenging due to the unique artifacts introduced by combining the two techniques. In this paper, we overview the artifacts present in TMS-EEG data and the offline cleaning methods used to suppress these unwanted signals. We then describe how open science practices, including the development of open-source toolboxes designed for TMS-EEG analysis (e.g., TESA - the TMS-EEG signal analyser), have improved the availability and reproducibility of TMS-EEG cleaning methods. We provide theoretical and practical considerations for designing TMS-EEG cleaning pipelines and then give an example of how to compare different pipelines using TESA. We show that changing even a single step in a pipeline designed to suppress decay artifacts results in TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) with small differences in amplitude and spatial topography. The variability in TEPs resulting from the choice of cleaning pipeline has important implications for comparing TMS-EEG findings between research groups which use different online and offline approaches. Finally, we discuss the challenges of validating cleaning pipelines and recommend that researchers compare outcomes from TMS-EEG experiments using multiple pipelines to ensure findings are not related to the choice of cleaning methods. We conclude that the continued improvement, availability, and validation of cleaning pipelines is essential to ensure TMS-EEG reaches its full potential as a method for studying human neurophysiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据